Europe and the US decide the winner before the vote
Belarus's government will be targeted if the west doesn't get the result it wants in this month's elections
The Guardian
March 10, 2006
Submitted by A. Shpakousky

Would you expect a European leader who has presided over a continual increase in real wages for several years, culminating in a 24% rise over the past 12 months, to be voted out of office? What if he has also cut VAT, brought down inflation, halved the number of people in poverty in the past seven years, and avoided social tensions by maintaining the fairest distribution of incomes of any country in the region? . Of course not, you would say. In Bill Clinton's famous phrase, "it's the economy, stupid".

 
Alex Sh., the common Belarusan democratic movement: YES, I WOULD EXPECT THIS, BECAUSE I VALUE SOMETHING OTHER THAN THE ‘BREAD INSTEAD OF FREEDOM’
WHICH OBVIOUSLY HAVE TAKEN ‘IN’ SOME LIBERALS OF WEST EUROPE. Moreover, by which resources have you got this ‘precious & idyllic’ picture on Belarus? Maybe by the (secret) agencies of Moscow. Beware, like the Arabian oil-tycoons, they can pay a lot of money for the fraud to support a non-democratic “stability” in the border-countries  of Russia.  
 
2. Jonathan Steele: Unless there are overriding issues of political or personal insecurity - incipient civil war, ethnic cleansing, mass arrests, pervasive crime on the streets - most people will vote according to their pocketbooks. And so it is likely to be in Belarus in nine days' time.
 
Al. Sh.: I’m sorry, You are completely wrong again. One year ago Ukraine solved such problem absolutely different, in a modern European way voting by it’s brain, not by the stomach as you ironically ‘smile’ to. …And it was only one society (!) in the long row of self liberated East European countries which proves that certain hidden but not the less valuable process of moral renaissance going on in this region.
 
3. Jonathan Steele: Why, then, are western governments, echoed by most western media, developing a crescendo of one-sided reporting and comment on one of Europe's smallest countries?
 
Al. Sh.: Why? - Because this small country of Belarus is the ‘work-shop’ of future Russian dictatorship to appear. They “echoed” because the responsible western governments are worried by the rebirth of possible future withstand with Russia, which - “invisibly” for some ‘left’ West media, - getting more and more into the kind of Russian fascism on the ground of so called ‘Slavonic Values of Life’. To find out the realms of Belarusan life under the pro-Russian dictator Lukashenka, please read the current independent media as:
 
 
…But I’m sorry, some ‘reporters’ obviously will more believe not in these human rights watch reflections but in its own (‘thickness of’) purse. After all, such kind of disinformation traditionally is well paid by Russia.
 
4. Jonathan Steele: Condoleezza Rice, the US secretary of state, last year called it an "outpost of tyranny". Stephen Hadley, the US national security adviser, recently complained that "there is not enough outrage and international attention on Belarus". As if on cue, we now have thundering editorials and loaded reports in America and Europe claiming the imminent election is a farce and the regime deeply unpopular.
 
Al. Sh.: The only “cue” the responsible journalist can get from this message – to apply to event it’s own professional ethics as it is here:
 
5. Jonathan Steele: We saw similar conformism little more than a year ago in Ukraine, when one side was glorified to the skies, as if only a tiny minority of benighted Soviet era automatons did not support the pro-western candidate, Viktor Yushchenko. His opponent actually got 44% of the vote, and may even emerge with the highest number of votes in Ukraine's parliamentary elections in two weeks.
 
Al. Sh.: …Have You ever seen the “similar conformism” in the former republics of the USSR which now are the members of EU? Yes? - Then You see it from a very familiar bloody angle of ones, who once applauded to Hitler and Stalin.  Congratulations 21-th century ‘Guardian’!!!
 
6. Jonathan Steele: In Belarus, President Alexander Lukashenko is certainly no liberal. He manipulates state television; he bans distribution of critical newspapers from state-owned kiosks (which are the majority), and often has those that are printed abroad confiscated at the border; he makes it hard for opposition parties to hold rallies; and he uses the police in a partisan and frequently brutal way. Students fear expulsion and government employees the sack if they join protests.
This was already true in 1996 when I monitored a constitutional referendum on behalf of the European Institute for the Media and reported that the electoral climate was neither free nor fair. At that stage Lukashenko had only been in power for two years. An authoritarian populist and control freak then, he has remained true to form (not, however, a communist; Belarus has two communist parties, one of which is illegal).
 
Al. Sh.: What a shame while writing about, to see the ‘leaves’ and not to try to understand the roots of Belarusan problem and  phenomenon of this human monster of A.Lukashenka, which simultaneously appears as the main suspect in the murder and disappearances of the leaders of opposition in Belarus. This country lost about 30% of population in the World War 2, and now Mr.Lukashenka, - internationally unrecognized, self declared‘president’ absolutely openly hails Hitler… And the British journalist, as Mr. Jonathan Steele, practically declares that the people of Belarus is so uncivilized and different from the neighbours from Lithuania and Poland, that they can chose such a radical and incompetent person for the national Presidency at the free elections? What (a West European?) shame to say a kind of this!
 
7. Jonathan Steele:  The change is in the economy. Like other former Soviet republics, Belarus suffered a massive collapse after 1991, with output dropping by more than half thanks to "shock therapy" reforms. But in 12 years of power Lukashenko has righted that, as my opening statistics show (all taken from the IMF's country report on Belarus in June 2005).
I haven't been in Belarus for 10 years,
 
Al. Sh.: HERE WE ARE: the journalist reports to the Western public about the place where he even haven’t been! Again, what a (typical West European?) shame of possibilities to wide public deception… After this, how in the Earth you could pretend to be correct or honest with your report, Mr. Steele, if you still pretending to be a responsible journalist?
 
8. Jonathan Steele: but residents I speak to on the phone, as well as western visitors, report that most people are satisfied with their living standards. Many have family or other ties to Russia, their giant neighbour, and feel grateful for the stability, moderation and absence of an oligarch-dominated economy that Belarus enjoys.
 
Al. Sh.: This is the same picture as colonial ties (once of Britain) here and there are bringing down war to the local countries: one with the “Russian eye” sees the painted shape of society, but not the inside mud of human sufferings from dictatorship. “Easy come – easy go”, mister? (Such kind of Liberalism or lazy negligence makes harm not only to those neglected. For many people in the USA and East Europe it does characterize the West Europe as the “Old” part of the continent).
 
9. Jonathan Steele: Contrary to claims that Lukashenko's repression has produced an "information black hole", the choice of news is wider than in 1996. The EU-funded EuroNews channel is available on cable, which millions of people have, and access to uncensored websites is easy in internet clubs and cafes or at home.
 
Al. Sh.: Have You “forgotten” that these news are heavily suppressed by the mainstream info of the state media which misinforms society and “paints” the world in any subjective way of dictatorship. The media- and the huge Police-Generator of Fear in Belarus makes simply impossible the way of free actions for the average local citizen. …Welcome down to Belarus, once You must feel IT, Mr. Steele, if you able to... Do you really don’t know that The EU-funded EuroNews channel is “available on cable” only for a small part of population. Moreover, in result of going on the inner terror here, to the golden mean Belarusan citizen this outer Free information looks like for the aborigine from some (mental) island who sees the modern world… Citizens in Belarus are suppressed not only morally, politically but also financially and therefore they are cut off from the outside world. Imagine: they have only up to 150 dollars for month salary; peasants much less. Confess Mr. Steele, your local ‘friends-informers’ are staying somewhere in the Belarusan capital and know nothing or almost nothing about the depression of rural life in there.
 
10. Jonathan Steele: Despite this, there is a huge campaign by foreign governments to intervene in the Belarussian poll, even more controversially than in Ukraine in 2004. While Russia is hardly engaged in this election,
 
Al. Sh.: CURRENTLY RUSSIA IS THE MAIN SUPPORTER OF EVERY MORAL DIRT AND DICTATORSHIP AT ITS BORDERS. Without the Russian political, financial, and secret service support, the current Belarusan regime couldn't’t even ‘breath’ and inevitably got failed long ago. If this statement is not enough, please, ask on this subject any president of Eastern Europe.
 
11. Jonathan Steele: Europe and the US are pumping in money. According to the New York Times, cash is being smuggled from the US National Endowment for Democracy, Britain's Westminster Foundation and the German foreign ministry directly to Khopits, a network of young anti-Lukashenko activists.
 
Al. Sh.: They have NO choice as to support  democracy in a size of its own talent to democracy. But in comparison to the Russian “hand”, the westerners are far beside of Russia in Belarusian home affairs! “Slavonic Values of Life” (by the way, born at mainly Asian Russia) are dreaming of Stalin revenge and making every possible effort against the democracy in Belarus after they failed in Ukraine.
 
12. Jonathan Steele: Poland has reopened a state-owned radio station on its eastern border to beam programmes across Belarus, while the German government's Deutsche Welle started broadcasts to Belarus this year. Alexander Milinkevich, the main opposition candidate, has been touring European capitals and getting endorsements that amount to blatant interference in a foreign electoral contest.
 
Al. Sh.: Could you suppose, that Poland in its charismatic understanding of Human Rights can be more advanced than some West European “sleep-districts” of civilization with its immoral, (homosexual) dreams?; that the East European countries can be the modern cultural, or at least (for sure) political Tigers of whole Europe and that this part of a continent we could, - so far so good, - name The New Europe… Yes, or no – the purse ‘calls’ and determines someone's mind?  
 
13. Jonathan Steele: Some of this foreign money will be used to fund street protests promised by opposition activists if Lukashenko is declared the winner. They have already dubbed it the "denim revolution", giving supporters little bits of the cloth as symbols to copy the successful demonstrations in Ukraine and Georgia.  
 
Al. Sh.: Again you have completely forgotten about all the color revolutions in East Europe, from Czech Republic  to the Baltic states. …And the collapse of the USSR itself. Could it (the human common sense and will to self liberation) be initiated from the outside, abroad?
 
14. Jonathan Steele:  But why is the US, with the EU in its wake, so concerned about Belarus?
 
Al. Sh.: Yet another time: Belarus is the work-shop of Putin’s kind of ‘Russian democracy’, growing up latent Russian fascism. Please, read the independent media if having no time to come to Belarus.
 
15. Jonathan Steele:  Is it because Belarus stands out as the only ex-Soviet country that maintains majority state ownership of the economy and gets good results?
 
Al. Sh.: Is it the civilized way of national economy to follow yet another one tragic “Chilean Economics Phenomenon” (on the ground of the foreign, Russian totalitarian logistics and money) at the geographic centre of Europe?
 
16. Jonathan Steele: Is ideological deviance forbidden? (The IMF, while admitting Lukashenko's economic success, calls it "ultimately unsustainable", being based on cheap Russian energy imports and wage increases that outstrip productivity growth.)
 
Al. Sh.: Is it only the “ideological deviance” – via ‘Guardian’ to spread disinformation about the human rights violations in Belarus or it is the undoubtful proof of one’s professional corruption.
 
17. Jonathan Steele: Is the problem Lukashenko's independence, his friendliness to Russia and resistance to Nato, his abrasive, don't-push-me-around style? As one Minsk resident put it to me, he's a "Slavic Castro".  
 
Al. Sh.: What from the ‘left’ West looks like the “independence”, could be considerably different in another way of looking. How about understanding that the local  “achievements” in here became possible only after the current practical Belarusian economics’ enslavement to Russia. Consider this in the frame of One world economy circumstances. In some measure EU also is influenced by Russia in the same way after having the Gas&Oil pipes. The life shows today, that any friendliness to corrupted Russia means the personal corruptness and inevitable info-deception or even latent state dictatorship as it goes on in Belarus. Lukashenka’s resistance to NATO – has a very precise aim of emerging of Re-union of Belarus and Russia at the very moral ground of the USSR. (But writing such “reports” on Belarus for the famous paper, Mr. Steele even doesn’t bother himself to visit the place he is writing about. Thus how can we expect in the report even the ‘journalistic’ level of knowledge of the geopolitics around Belarus). 
 
18. Jonathan Steele:  The revolt against Lukashenko within Belarus is genuine, idealistic and, in some cases, courageous. As in the rest of eastern Europe, nationalist intellectuals and the urban elite, particularly in the capital, include many who want change and feel the rewards are worth the risk.
 
Al. Sh.: After such amount of disinformation it sounds at least as the next portion of irony.
 
19. Jonathan Steele:  They want the west's moral support and its freedom, as well as its money.
 
Al. Sh.: Those, you say: “west's moral support and its freedom” - are not particularly ‘west’s’. The support we seek lies in the Common Sense’s, this is the universal human kind support. Potentially Belarus is a very industrialized and educated country which in the circumstances of democracy will be truly the genuine and reach part of Europe. The freedom we want – as the source has a morality of Bible, and quality of the First Constitution of the USA. I agree, this looks a bit different, even rare if not strange from the point of view of the world’s Liberalism (organized immoratily and illuminati). I’m sorry.
 
20. Jonathan Steele:  But they are not the majority. A poll in January by Gallup/Baltic Surveys, and reported in the emigre Belarusian Review, found only 17% in favour of Milinkevich and nearly 55% supporting Lukashenko.
 
Al. Sh.: Can you imagine that all the British media started to “pray” only one someone’s personality? No? Even the Prince’s of Wales… Can you imagine the totalitarian state and closed borders of Britain, 150 dollar a month salary and completely tendentious, crazy media which started describe the ‘British Imperial Values of Life’ – as the advanced ones and even better than democracy’s ones? If you understand this, plus – the hard dictatorial legacy of Belarus and 200 years’ ethno-cide to the native people, culture and language from side of Russia, - then you can be sure, that we need the every bit of inner self liberation, independence and international support to democracy in Belarus not in the less scale than the British people thankfully (to God) used to. 
 
21. Jonathan Steele:  Western funders claim their motives are innocent, with help offered merely to develop "democracy" and "European values". In that case they should insist that the groups and the media they aid in Belarus are fair, accurate and intelligent, rather than one-sided demonizers of their opponents, mirroring Lukashenko's approach.
 
Al. Sh.: Congratulations! Here we have the first signs of future British propaganda J). Because on the contrary Mr. Lukashenka is demonizing himself more than any one can do it from the outside. Listen again to his presidency message if you will: “Hitler did not only bad. Hitler had united Germany. And this is the example for the current Belarusan (read, Russian!!! –A.Sh.) statecraft” (From the official interview to the German magazine).
 
22. Jonathan Steele:   But when western media, despite their vaunted objectivity and years of democratic experience, also report on Belarus in a way that is narrow and partisan, this is asking a lot.
 
Al. Sh.: This is simply a fraud of one, who knows nothing about the real life in Belarus. And please, take it in account with proper attention: till the recent time even at the BBC web-site in the list of European countries there was no Belarus as if it doesn’t exist at all. But there is Turkey …and beware of a certain amount of such kind of disinformation as Mr. Steele seemingly does disseminate with the pages of ‘Guardian’.   
Thanks.
 
the e-mail of Mr. Steele:

 

 





x x

 

About | Contact | Home | Submit | Subscribe | Advertise

© OrbStandard.com / Natural Philosophers International

x


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.